User blog comment:Lathagarr Stormgale of Tronn/Debate/@comment-1607590-20101203213238/@comment-1153441-20101221210834

Neil: All of that may be true, and then again it may not be. But all that the article said was that Peter co founded the church in Rome, and was the leader of the church of Jerusalem. That doesn't prove that he was the first Pope. (I didn't read the whole thing, so if you find anything that I missed please point it out to me.) As for the passage of scripture in Matthew 16 I already addressed that (I'm not sure if you remember or not).

BTW, you didn't answer my question about one of the qualifications for being the Pope.