User blog comment:Lathagarr Stormgale of Tronn/Debate/@comment-1607590-20101203213238/@comment-1153441-20101222042959

If it is true that one of the qualifications for being Pope is infallibility in spiritual matters then that rules out Peter as being the Pope, since Peter rebuked Jesus when Jesus said that he was going to be crucified. Isn't that the sin of disobedience to God?

Even though I didn't read the entire article I do have to admit that the guy who wrote it put together a pretty good amount of evidence. I would just like to say though that I still stand in my belief on this matter, and I'm sure that you are the same. Since like I said in a few comments above this difference in denomination isn't a really huge one as far as salvation goes, I think we should just agree to disagree and leave it at that. I just don't think that this matter is that important. What do you think?